Rephrase comment to explain original intention of function.

CC: Lidza Louina <lidza.lou...@gmail.com>
CC: Mark Hounschell <ma...@compro.net>
Suggested-by: Tobias Klauser <tklau...@distanz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Seunghun Lee <way...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
index 4b65306..5a76a8e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
@@ -1040,11 +1040,11 @@ static void cls_flush_uart_read(struct channel_t *ch)
         * For complete POSIX compatibility, we should be purging the
         * read FIFO in the UART here.
         *
-        * However, doing the statement below also incorrectly flushes
-        * write data as well as just basically trashing the FIFO.
+        * However, clearing the read FIFO (UART_FCR_CLEAR_RCVR) also
+        * incorrectly flushes write data as well as just basically trashing the
+        * FIFO.
         *
-        * I believe this is a BUG in this UART.
-        * So for now, we will leave the code #ifdef'ed out...
+        * Presumably, this is a bug in this UART.
         */
 
        udelay(10);
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to