It is suggested that cpumask_var_t and alloc_cpumask_var() should be used
instead of struct cpumask. But I don't want to add this complicity nor
leave this unwelcome "static struct cpumask has_work;", so I just remove
it and use flush_work() to perform on all online drain_work. flush_work()
performs very quickly on initialized but unused work item, thus we don't
need the struct cpumask has_work for performance.
CC: a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: Chris Metcalf <cmetc...@tilera.com>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
CC: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <c...@gentwo.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/swap.c | 11 ++++-------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 9e8e347..bb524ca 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -833,27 +833,24 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct,
lru_add_drain_work);
void lru_add_drain_all(void)
{
static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
- static struct cpumask has_work;
int cpu;
mutex_lock(&lock);
get_online_cpus();
- cpumask_clear(&has_work);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct work_struct *work = &per_cpu(lru_add_drain_work, cpu);
+ INIT_WORK(work, lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
+
if (pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_add_pvec, cpu)) ||
pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate_pvecs, cpu)) ||
pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_deactivate_pvecs, cpu)) ||
- need_activate_page_drain(cpu)) {
- INIT_WORK(work, lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
+ need_activate_page_drain(cpu))
schedule_work_on(cpu, work);
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &has_work);
- }
}
- for_each_cpu(cpu, &has_work)
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
flush_work(&per_cpu(lru_add_drain_work, cpu));
put_online_cpus();
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
