On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com> wrote:
> gpio_ensure_requested() only makes sense when using the integer-based > GPIO API, so make sure it is called from there instead of the gpiod > API which we know cannot be called with a non-requested GPIO anyway. > > The uses of gpio_ensure_requested() in the gpiod API were kind of > out-of-place anyway, so putting them in gpio-legacy.c helps clearing the > code. > > Actually, considering the time this ensure_requested mechanism has been > around, maybe we should just turn this patch into "remove > gpio_ensure_requested()" if we know for sure that no user depend on it > anymore? > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com> Patch applied. Make a separate patch on top to delete this thing since there are ZERO in-kernel users. The only place it's used in a comment in arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/vision_ep9307.c .... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
