Em Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:07:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:43:08PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > > >> @@ -106,6 +107,8 @@ int comm__override(struct comm *comm, const char > > >> *str, u64 timestamp) > > >> comm_str__put(old); > > >> comm->comm_str = new; > > >> comm->start = timestamp; > > >> + if (exec && !comm->exec) > > >> + comm->exec = true; > > > > Why do you need the !comm->exec test? > > > Dunno > > I saw that you kept it in the last patchkit submitted, I'll just drop > it, needless obfuscation.
Also why do you need to "identify which comms are from exec", was it good for? - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
