On 07/22/2014 10:22 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:17:26PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>>  }
>> +
>> +int perf_evlist__set_tracking_event(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>> +                                struct perf_evsel *tracking_evsel)
>> +{
>> +    struct perf_evsel *evsel;
>> +
>> +    if (tracking_evsel->idx == 0)
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    if (tracking_evsel->leader->nr_members > 1)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    list_for_each_entry(evsel, &evlist->entries, node) {
>> +            if (evsel->idx < tracking_evsel->idx)
>> +                    evsel->idx += 1;
>> +    }
>> +    tracking_evsel->idx = 0;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
> 
> wouldnt it be better to add evsel->is_tracking bool for this?

Yes, I will look at doing that instead.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to