On 07/22/2014 10:22 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:17:26PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > SNIP > >> } >> + >> +int perf_evlist__set_tracking_event(struct perf_evlist *evlist, >> + struct perf_evsel *tracking_evsel) >> +{ >> + struct perf_evsel *evsel; >> + >> + if (tracking_evsel->idx == 0) >> + return 0; >> + >> + if (tracking_evsel->leader->nr_members > 1) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(evsel, &evlist->entries, node) { >> + if (evsel->idx < tracking_evsel->idx) >> + evsel->idx += 1; >> + } >> + tracking_evsel->idx = 0; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} > > wouldnt it be better to add evsel->is_tracking bool for this?
Yes, I will look at doing that instead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/