On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:17:23PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > > Now, I already mentioned max error bounds, and I've not yet looked at > > your actual control loop, but that is something to keep in mind, we want > > something that's limited. > > Indeed. Richard has already expressed concerns that my coefficients > won't work everywhere (as in with different clock rate ratios) and he's > most likely right. My money is on a more advanced, "self-tuning" > solution, where we definitely need an escape condition.
I was wanting to look up software PLLs, as I seem to remember that's what NTP and PTP use, but Richard should know I think. Its not really a subject I've looked at before. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
