On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:02:00PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> worker_set_flags() doesn't necessarily wake next worker and the @wakeup
> can be removed, the caller can use the following conbination instead
> when needed:
> 
>       worker_set_flags();
>       if (need_more_worker(pool))
>               wake_up_worker(pool);
> 
> It reduces the machine-code and footprint for the process_one_work()
> if worker_set_flags() is really inlined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>

Applied 1-2 to wq/for-3.17 w/ descriptions and comments updated.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to