On 21.07.2014 [12:53:33 -0700], Alexander Duyck wrote: > I do agree the description should probably be changed. There shouldn't be > any panics involved, only a performance impact as it will be reallocating > always if it is on a node with no memory.
Yep, thanks for the review. > My intention on this was to make certain that the memory used is from the > closest node possible. As such I believe this change likely honours that. Absolutely, just wanted to make it explicit that it's not a functional fix, just a performance fix (presuming this shows up at all on systems that have memoryless NUMA nodes). I'd suggest an update to the comments, as well. Thanks, Nish -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
