On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 07:11:51PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: SNIP
> I have the following now: > > |$ ../perf data convert -i perf.data.backup --to-ctf ctf-out-backup && > babeltrace ctf-out-backup > |[11:01:45.468071953] (+?.?????????) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 2906, comm = "sshd", id = 0xE, args = [ [0] = 0x0, [1] = > 0x7FFF18EB71F0, [2] = 0x7FFF18EB7170, [3] = 0x8, [4] = 0x0, [5] = 0x0 ] } > |[11:01:45.468074246] (+0.000002293) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 2906, comm = "sshd", id = 0xE, args = [ [0] = 0x2, [1] = > 0x7FFF18EB7170, [2] = 0x0, [3] = 0x8, [4] = 0x0, [5] = 0x0 ] } > |[11:01:45.468076200] (+0.000001954) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 2906, comm = "sshd", id = 0x0, args = [ [0] = 0xE, [1] = > 0x7FFF18EB3140, [2] = 0x4000, [3] = 0x0, [4] = 0x8CF9, [5] = 0x0 ] } > |[11:01:45.468097941] (+0.000021741) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 2906, comm = "sshd", id = 0x17, args = [ [0] = 0x18, [1] = > 0x7F9E804FBBB0, [2] = 0x7F9E804FBB90, [3] = 0x0, [4] = 0x0, [5] = 0x0 ] } > |[11:01:45.468100727] (+0.000002786) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 2906, comm = "sshd", id = 0xE, args = [ [0] = 0x0, [1] = > 0x7FFF18EB71F0, [2] = 0x7FFF18EB7170, [3] = 0x8, [4] = 0x0, [5] = 0x0 ] } > |[11:01:45.468101797] (+0.000001070) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 2906, comm = "sshd", id = 0xE, args = [ [0] = 0x2, [1] = > 0x7FFF18EB7170, [2] = 0x0, [3] = 0x8, [4] = 0x0, [5] = 0x0 ] } > |[11:01:45.468103615] (+0.000001818) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 2906, comm = "sshd", id = 0x1, args = [ [0] = 0x3, [1] = > 0x7F9E805472E0, [2] = 0x30, [3] = 0x0, [4] = 0x8CF9, [5] = 0x0 ] } > |[11:01:45.468126271] (+0.000022656) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 2906, comm = "sshd", id = 0x17, args = [ [0] = 0x18, [1] = > 0x7F9E804FBBB0, [2] = 0x7F9E804FBB90, [3] = 0x0, [4] = 0x0, [5] = 0x0 ] } > |[11:01:45.468140058] (+0.000013787) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 7121, comm = "perf_3.14", id = 0x10, args = [ [0] = 0x10, [1] = > 0x2400, [2] = 0x0, [3] = 0x7FFFCCDED220, [4] = 0x2505110, [5] = > 0x7FB588E31780 ] } > |[11:01:45.468141518] (+0.000001460) raw_syscalls:sys_enter: { cpu_id = 0 }, > { pid = 7121, comm = "perf_3.14", id = 0x10, args = [ [0] = 0x18, [1] = > 0x2400, [2] = 0x0, [3] = 0x7FFFCCDED220, [4] = 0x2505110, [5] = > 0x7FB588E31780 ] } > … > |[11:01:45.468208465] (+0.000000062) irq:softirq_raise: { cpu_id = 0 }, { pid > = 0, comm = "swapper", vec = 3 } > |[11:01:45.468209788] (+0.000001323) irq:softirq_entry: { cpu_id = 0 }, { pid > = 0, comm = "swapper", vec = 3 } heya, I've got following build error: CC util/data-bt.o util/data-bt.c: In function ‘add_event_tracepoint_value’: util/data-bt.c:293:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bt_ctf_event_class_get_field_by_name’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] type = bt_ctf_event_class_get_field_by_name( ^ util/data-bt.c:293:3: error: nested extern declaration of ‘bt_ctf_event_class_get_field_by_name’ [-Werror=nested-externs] util/data-bt.c:293:8: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror] type = bt_ctf_event_class_get_field_by_name( ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[1]: *** [util/data-bt.o] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 but I might be missing some of the babeltrace changes, my branch: 5805251d8079 Fix: mmap trace read the stream_id from the first packet > … > > In brief: > - added support for PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, broked everything else. Fixing > this on todo :) > - added support for multiple type of arguments (pid & comm is "generic", > id, args, vec is based on tp_format which I don't fully understand but > it seems to work (the python script writes NR instead id or adds > "[action=NET_RX]" behind vec=3 and I haven't figured out what kind of > magic that is)). > > I pushed my current state to: > http://git.breakpoint.cc/cgit/bigeasy/linux.git/log/?h=perf_ctf_3 > git://git.breakpoint.cc/bigeasy/linux.git perf_ctf_3 > > It is based on TIP tree from last friday and I fixed up some of your > cows :) > > Some of your patches lack a sign-off by line. If I am allowed to add them > then I would post the complete thing for a public review. Otherwiese I am > open to suggestions how we could proceed here. feel free to use/change my commits as you wish ;-) I think the best would be to merge your changes with mine into some meaningful patchset, before it goes to review I'll check your changes thanks, jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/