While we enqueue a new timer on a dynticks target, we must send it an
IPI so that it reschedules the next tick accordingly.

Now all we need for that is to run irq_exit() on the target. Hence
an empty IRQ is way enough. We don't need to run tick_nohz_full_check()
and all the overhead that comes with the several cmpxchg() necessary for
irq work list and state progress.

So lets use a void irq work instead.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7f3063c..f3e48b8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static bool wake_up_full_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
        if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu)) {
                if (cpu != smp_processor_id() ||
                    tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
-                       tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(cpu);
+                       irq_work_void_on(cpu);
                return true;
        }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to