On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:49 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 07:35:26AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > Using the one-liner above also makes it harder to > > automate checkpatch neatening and avoid using Lindent: > > automated checkpatch?? More idiocy... we want less, in case you've > forgotten.
"we" is a subset of "all of us". > <snip more pointless justification attempts> Those are not at all pointless if you intend to fix any issue found by the tool. I think your viewpoint is a bit tainted as you're the same guy that wrote "fuck readability". https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/19/116 > It is about time people understood that and dropped the senseless frenzy > of creating patches with less time spent on thinking about them than > preparing them. I suggest you try writing some documentation patches instead of acrid emails. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
