> > > Please grab 2.6.11, apply the below patch, set CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER and > > > follow > > > the below instructions. > > > > thank you for you mails. We installed the patch from Alex on a test-system > > last night and will switch it to the production machine this evening. The > > problem will start after 48-72 hours, so we hope to send feedback > > on friday. > > Ok, we had another crash this morning after an uptime of only 36 > hours 8-(. > > No oom-killer this time, but we got a very high load (>40) in the > end. Our cron-job which starts the page_owner-sort every 10 minutes > didn't return the last 4 times. > > The new 2.6.11-kernel changed the graphs a little bit - values for > 'MemTree' are much higher, but values for 'Cached' and 'Buffered' are > still very low. > > Here the graph for the last week: > > http://download.hennerich.de/memory-leak2.png > > (the left part is the same like our first graph last week > http://download.hennerich.de/memory-leak.png, the weekend is well visible) > > Detailed view of the last 40 hours: > > http://download.hennerich.de/memory-leak3.png > > Some output of the page_owner-sort: > > > http://download.hennerich.de/page_owner_sorted_20050311_0820.bz2
Yikes something isn't right with these backtraces that page_owner is showing. Even without frame pointers it shouldn't be this noisy. I'm afraid I'm going to need to ask for more help, could you please select CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER under Kernel hacking => "Compile the kernel with frame pointers" And when that kernel is booted, could you directly send me the output of /proc/page_owner (sort or unsorted) so that I can see if something is wrong with the data it's producing (just to be sure). If it works better with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, i'm also going to have to ask you to do another one of these runs that you just did. Thanks Alexander - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/