Ingo Molnar wrote on Friday, March 11, 2005 1:32 AM > > -static unsigned int task_timeslice(task_t *p) > > +static inline unsigned int task_timeslice(task_t *p) > > the patch looks good except this one - could you try to undo it and > re-measure? task_timeslice() is not used in any true fastpath, if it > makes any difference then the performance difference must be some other > artifact.
OK, I'll re-measure. Yeah, I agree that this function is not in the fastpath. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/