This was discussed back in February 
        https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/18/956
But I never saw a patch come out of it.

On Ivybridge we share the Sandybridge cache event tables, but the
dTLB-load-miss event is not compatible.  Patch it up after
the fact to the proper DTLB_LOAD_MISSES.DEMAND_LD_MISS_CAUSES_A_WALK

Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.wea...@maine.edu>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index adb02aa..f5784f0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2465,6 +2465,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
        case 62: /* IvyBridge EP */
                memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids,
                       sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
+               /* dTLB-load-misses on IVB is different than SNB */
+               hw_cache_event_ids[C(DTLB)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = 
0x8108; /* DTLB_LOAD_MISSES.DEMAND_LD_MISS_CAUSES_A_WALK */
+
                memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snb_hw_cache_extra_regs,
                       sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to