* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should arrange for touch_softlockup_watchdog() to be called
> whenever touch_nmi_watchdog() is called.
the patch below adds a touch_softlockup_watchdog() call to every
touch_nmi_watchdog() call.
[A future consolidation patch should introduce a touch_watchdogs() call
that will do both a touch_nmi_watchdog() [if available on the platform]
and a touch_softlockup_watchdog() call.]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c.orig
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -378,6 +378,11 @@ void touch_nmi_watchdog (void)
*/
for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
alert_counter[i] = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Tickle the softlockup detector too:
+ */
+ touch_softlockup_watchdog();
}
void nmi_watchdog_tick (struct pt_regs * regs, unsigned reason)
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c.orig
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -469,6 +469,11 @@ void touch_nmi_watchdog (void)
*/
for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
alert_counter[i] = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Tickle the softlockup detector too:
+ */
+ touch_softlockup_watchdog();
}
extern void die_nmi(struct pt_regs *, const char *msg);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
