On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 15:07 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> This is a rewrite of the saa7110_write_block function, which was plain
> broken in the case where the underlying adapter supports I2C_FUNC_I2C.
> It also includes related fixes which ensure that different parts of the
> driver agree on the number of registers the chip has.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> --- linux-2.6.11-bk3/drivers/media/video/saa7110.c.orig       Tue Mar  8 
> 10:27:15 2005
> +++ linux-2.6.11-bk3/drivers/media/video/saa7110.c    Tue Mar  8 12:02:45 2005
> @@ -58,10 +58,12 @@
>  #define SAA7110_MAX_INPUT    9       /* 6 CVBS, 3 SVHS */
>  #define SAA7110_MAX_OUTPUT   0       /* its a decoder only */
>  
> -#define      I2C_SAA7110             0x9C    /* or 0x9E */
> +#define I2C_SAA7110          0x9C    /* or 0x9E */

Not that I really care, but isn't there a rule that a patch "... can not
contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes, whitespace
cleanups, etc.)"?

josh


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to