On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:56:15AM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Greg KH wrote: > > >On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:01:51AM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > >>>From cf37d0cc4d51da5c0b368e1f5ab05082c041d1e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>From: "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.korni...@gmail.com> > >>Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:08:45 +0400 > >>Subject: [PATCHv3 2/2] Add force_epp module option for parport_pc. > >> > >>The detection of Intel EPP bug is known to produce much false positives. > >>The new option is introduced to force enable EPP in spite of the test > >>result. > > Hi, > > First of all, maybe I missed something fundamental, or did something wrong, > but I can't understand how is it going to break working systems?
I thought you disabled the quirk test and now rely on the module option instead. That would require a machine that was happily relying on the quirk test to now be forced to add a module option, right? Or did I read the patch incorrectly? Why not implement Alan's suggestion? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
