Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no> writes: > What I suggest to do is: > > Leave NET_NAME_UNKNOWN in alloc_etherdev() (and any similar > constructs), but in the cases where we know that the final name set > before netdev_register() is some template, I'd still set this to > NET_NAME_ENUM as we do now to make it clear which cases have been > reviewed. So the patchset does not change much, but it would eliminate > any risk of false positives. > > Does that sound reasonable to you?
Yes, sure. Although I'm not at all convinced about the value. But I don't need to be, as that is not for me to decide :-) Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
