> The CMCI storm handler previously called cmci_reenable() when exiting a > CMCI storm. However, when entering a CMCI storm the bank ownership was > not relinquished by the affected CPUs. The CMCIs were only disabled via > cmci_storm_disable_banks(). The handler was updated to instead call a > new function, cmci_storm_enable_banks(), to reenable CMCI on the already > owned banks instead of rediscovering CMCI banks (which were still owned > but disabled).
Won't this cause problems if we online a cpu during the storm. We will re-run the discovery algorithm and some other cpu that shares the bank will see MCi_CTL2{30} is zero and claim ownership. -Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/