David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What's with the preempt_enable()/disable() added to __key_link()? It's not > > obvious what is being protected from what, and why. > > Ummm... Yes... They're probably not necessary. A wmb() may be required after > the klist->nkeys++ to commit to memory the fact there's now an extra key link > available, but I'm not sure that it's necessary.
ok... > Do you want me to redo the patch? > That, or a delta. At your convenience. What's your feeling on the stability&&priority of this work? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
