On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > Relying on static functions used just once to get inlined (and > subsequently have dead code paths eliminated) is wrong: Compilers are > free to decide whether they do this, regardless of optimization level. > With this not happening for vdso_addr() (observed with gcc 4.1.x), an > unresolved reference to align_vdso_addr() causes the build to fail. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> Any chance you could send a dump of the symbol and relocation tables of a .so.dbg with this problem? I'm curious why checkundef.sh never caught it. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
