Unless we want to double-penalize an overrun task, the time after the deadline
and before the current time is already accounted in the negative dl_se->runtime
value. So we can leave it as is in the case of dmiss && rorun.
Signed-off-by: Zhihui Zhang <zzhs...@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index fc4f98b1..67df0d6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -579,10 +579,8 @@ int dl_runtime_exceeded(struct rq *rq, struct
sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
* the next instance. Thus, if we do not account that, we are
* stealing bandwidth from the system at each deadline miss!
*/
- if (dmiss) {
- dl_se->runtime = rorun ? dl_se->runtime : 0;
- dl_se->runtime -= rq_clock(rq) - dl_se->deadline;
- }
+ if (dmiss && !rorun)
+ dl_se->runtime = dl_se->deadline - rq_clock(rq);
return 1;
}
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
