So I came back to this patch (now part of Greg's tree)

On May 2, 2014, at 10:50 PM, Fredrick John Berchmans wrote:

> Change old way of ops->setsockopt or ops->getsockopt in kernel
> to kernel_setsockopt or kernel_getsockopt.
> 
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-tcpip.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-tcpip.c
> @@ -56,21 +56,8 @@ libcfs_sock_ioctl(int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>               CERROR ("Can't create socket: %d\n", rc);
>               return rc;
>       }
> -
> -     sock_filp = sock_alloc_file(sock, 0, NULL);
> -     if (IS_ERR(sock_filp)) {
> -             sock_release(sock);
> -             rc = PTR_ERR(sock_filp);
> -             goto out;
> -     }
> -
> -     set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> -     if (sock_filp->f_op->unlocked_ioctl)
> -             rc = sock_filp->f_op->unlocked_ioctl(sock_filp, cmd, arg);
> -     set_fs(oldmm);
> -
> -     fput(sock_filp);
> -out:
> +     rc = kernel_sock_ioctl(sock, cmd, arg);
> +     sock_release(sock);
>       return rc;
> }

This part totally breaks lustre, we use this to also call things like 
SIOCGIFCONF that are not available from socket proto_ops because this is really 
coming from dev_ioctl and I do not see any better way to access it.
So I'd like this to be reverted or if there is a better way to access this, I 
am interested to learn it.

Bye,
    Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to