On 06/20/2014 09:17 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> diff -puN /dev/null arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
> --- /dev/null 2014-04-10 11:28:14.066815724 -0700
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h 2014-06-20
> 09:15:38.968987152 -0700
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +#ifndef _ASM_X86_DISABLED_FEATURES_H
> +#define _ASM_X86_DISABLED_FEATURES_H
> +
> +/* These features, although they might be available in a CPU
> + * will not be used because the compile options to support
> + * them are not present.
> + *
> + * This code allows them to be checked and disabled at
> + * compile time withut an explicit #ifdef. Simply call
> + * cpu_has() or this_cpu_has().
> + * */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX
> +# define HAVE_MPX (1<<(X86_FEATURE_MPX & 31))
> +#else
> +# define HAVE_MPX 0
> +#endif
> +
Is this an inverted test?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
