On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:19:31PM -0400, James A Shackleford wrote:
> The function iwctl_siwscan() is defined in iwctl.c as:
> int iwctl_siwscan(struct net_device *dev,
> struct iw_request_info *info,
> struct iw_point *wrq,
> char *extra)
> {
> ...
>
> This patch updates iwctl.h so that the type of the 3rd parameter (*wqr) in the
> function declaration matches the definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: James A Shackleford <sh...@linux.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.h b/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.h
> index 871bd7c..4ad5e48 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.h
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int iwctl_giwscan(struct net_device *dev,
>
> int iwctl_siwscan(struct net_device *dev,
> struct iw_request_info *info,
> - struct iw_param *wrq,
> + struct iw_point *wrq,
> char *extra);
>
Why isn't the compiler catching this issue? Should something include
this .h file?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
