Hi,

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55:35AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> $subject - ARM: dts:
> 
> On 06/18/2014 10:43 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > by providing phandles to rtc and wdt nodes, we can
> > let boards enable rtc and wdt as necessary.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
> > index 49fa596..e3830d4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
> > @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
> >                     ti,hwmods = "counter_32k";
> >             };
> >  
> > -           rtc@44e3e000 {
> > +           rtc: rtc@44e3e000 {
> >                     compatible = "ti,am4372-rtc","ti,da830-rtc";
> >                     reg = <0x44e3e000 0x1000>;
> >                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 75 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> > @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
> >                     status = "disabled";
> >             };
> >  
> > -           wdt@44e35000 {
> > +           wdt: wdt@44e35000 {
> >                     compatible = "ti,am4372-wdt","ti,omap3-wdt";
> >                     reg = <0x44e35000 0x1000>;
> >                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 91 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > 
> we might want to fix up any other similar nodes in dtsi as well, no?
>
> examples:
> cpu@0

and why would you want boards to mess with the cpu node ?

> dispc@4832a400

perhaps

> Might also be nice to have Fixes: to point out which commit was being
> fixed, no?

no other board enables those, so I wouldn't consider it a fix.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to