Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:

> Il 18/06/2014 18:43, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>>> > mwait and monitor are currently handled as nop. Considering this 
>>> > behavior, they
>>> > should still be handled correctly, i.e., check execution conditions and 
>>> > generate
>>> > exceptions when required. mwait and monitor may also be executed in 
>>> > real-mode
>> Is this necessary ? They are NOPs and kvm prints that out (correctly so) to 
>> dmesg.
>> Implementing them correctly is a different thing, but adding extra checks 
>> for NOPs
>> just seems like adding extra cycles.
>
> Raising the correct exception is a good thing, though.  The guest is
> going to busy wait anyway, it doesn't matter how fast it does that. :)

Thanks, makes sense. I was also thinking why to advertise it at all, but it's 
probably more common than I think it is.

> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to