On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:53:43AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:28:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:36:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > But we end up with a cset in the permanent kernel history which simply > > > > should not have been there. > > > > > > Is this really a big deal? > > > > Once? No. If it ends up being "par for the course", it's bad. > > The amount of stuff in the sucker tree shouldn't really amount > to /that/ many patches should it ? If it does, then 2.6.x is in > worse shape than we've all been admitting. > > Would it be that much work to just send the 'meat' as gnu patches, > and leave the not-for-linus stuff alone ?
No it would not be, and should be the way this works. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
