Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > cramfs-small-stat2-fix.patch > > setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve-oops-fix.patch > > dv1394-ioctl-retval-fix.patch > > ppc32-compilation-fixes-for-ebony-luan-and-ocotea.patch > > nfsd--sgi-921857-find-broken-with-nohide-on-nfsv3.patch > > nfsd--exportfs-reduce-stack-usage.patch > > Unless it's crashing for people, stack usage is IMO a wanted-fix not > needed-fix.
Sure. The patch is bog-obvious though. > > > nfsd--svcrpc-add-a-per-flavor-set_client-method.patch > > is this critical? Doubt it, unless the succeeding patches have a dependency on it. But the other patches have not been tested without this one being present. These patches have been in mm for four weeks, so it's probably OK from a stability POV to take them straight into linux-release. If they were fresher then the way to handle them would be to merge them into Linus's tree and backport in a couple of weeks time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
