On 6/12/14, Denis Kirjanov <k...@linux-powerpc.org> wrote: > On 6/12/14, Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote: >> On 11 Jun 2014, at 21:04, Denis Kirjanov <k...@linux-powerpc.org> wrote: >>> On 6/11/14, Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 04:13:07PM +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote: >>>>> I got a trace while running 3.15.0-08556-gdfb9454: >>>>> >>>>> [ 104.534026] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at >>>>> address 0xc00000007f000000 >>>> >>>> Were there any kmemleak messages prior to this, like "kmemleak >>>> disabled"? There could be a race when kmemleak is disabled because of >>>> some fatal (for kmemleak) error while the scanning is taking place >>>> (which needs some more thinking to fix properly). >>> >>> No. I checked for the similar problem and didn't find anything relevant. >>> I'll try to bisect it. >> >> Does this happen soon after boot? I guess it’s the first scan >> (scheduled at around 1min after boot). Something seems to be telling >> kmemleak that there is a valid memory block at 0xc00000007f000000. > > Yeah, it happens after a while with a booted system so that's the > first kmemleak scan. > >> Catalin >
I've bisected to this commit: d4c54919ed86302094c0ca7d48a8cbd4ee753e92 "mm: add !pte_present() check on existing hugetlb_entry callbacks". Reverting the commit fixes the issue -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
