Hi Steve,

Attached is the modified test program.  Here is the sample output:

localhost ~ # ./ftrace-test-epoll-kafai
           <...>-1857  [000] ...1   720.174295: tracing_mark_write: some data
1857: waitting for more data......
1858: written more data
<block here>

Thanks,
--Martin

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:49:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 23:06:42 -0700
> Martin Lau <ka...@fb.com> wrote:
> 
> > ring_buffer_poll_wait() should always put the poll_table to its wait_queue
> > even there is immediate data available.  Otherwise, the following epoll and
> > read sequence will eventually hang forever:
> > 
> > 1. Put some data to make the trace_pipe ring_buffer read ready first
> > 2. epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, trace_pipe_fd, ee)
> > 3. epoll_wait()
> > 4. read(trace_pipe_fd) till EAGAIN
> > 5. Add some more data to the trace_pipe ring_buffer
> > 6. epoll_wait() -> this epoll_wait() will block forever
> > 
> > ~ During the epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD,...) call in step 2,
> >   ring_buffer_poll_wait() returns immediately without adding poll_table,
> >   which has poll_table->_qproc pointing to ep_poll_callback(), to its
> >   wait_queue.
> > ~ During the epoll_wait() call in step 3 and step 6,
> >   ring_buffer_poll_wait() cannot add ep_poll_callback() to its wait_queue
> >   because the poll_table->_qproc is NULL and it is how epoll works.
> > ~ When there is new data available in step 6, ring_buffer does not know
> >   it has to call ep_poll_callback() because it is not in its wait queue.
> >   Hence, block forever.
> > 
> > Other poll implementation seems to call poll_wait() unconditionally as the 
> > very
> > first thing to do.  For example, tcp_poll() in tcp.c.
> 
> I'm trying to see the effect of this bug, but can't seem to reproduce
> it. Maybe I did something wrong. Attached is a test program I wrote
> trying to follow your instructions. I don't use epoll, so perhaps I
> didn't use it correctly.
> 
> Can you modify it to show me the problem this is trying to fix. That
> is, without this patch it hangs, but with the patch it does not.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Lau <ka...@fb.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ----
> >  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> > index fd12cc5..a6e64e8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> > @@ -613,10 +613,6 @@ int ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, 
> > int cpu,
> >     struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
> >     struct rb_irq_work *work;
> >  
> > -   if ((cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS && !ring_buffer_empty(buffer)) ||
> > -       (cpu != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS && !ring_buffer_empty_cpu(buffer, 
> > cpu)))
> > -           return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> > -
> >     if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS)
> >             work = &buffer->irq_work;
> >     else {
> 

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/epoll.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <assert.h>

static const char * debugfs_list[] = {
        "/debug/tracing",
        "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing",
        "/d/tracing",
        NULL,
};

static const char *debugfs;
static int markfd;
static int trace_pipe_fd;

static const char *find_debugfs(void)
{
        struct stat st;
        int i;
        int r;

        for (i = 0; debugfs_list[i]; i++) {
                r = stat(debugfs_list[i], &st);
                if (r < 0)
                        continue;
                if (S_ISDIR(st.st_mode))
                        return debugfs_list[i];
        }
        return NULL;
}

static char * make_path(const char *file)
{
        char *path;
        int size;

        size = strlen(debugfs) + strlen(file) + 2;
        path = malloc(size);
        if (!path) {
                perror("malloc");
                exit(-1);
        }
        sprintf(path, "%s/%s", debugfs, file);
        return path;
}

static void mark_write(const char *str)
{
        write(markfd, str, strlen(str));
}

static void read_trace_pipe(void)
{
        char buf[1024];
        int r;

        while ((r = read(trace_pipe_fd, buf, 1024)) > 0)
                printf("%.*s", r, buf);
}

int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
        struct epoll_event ee;
        char *marker;
        char *pipe;
        int efd;
        int ret;
        pid_t dwrt_pid;

        debugfs = find_debugfs();
        if (!debugfs) {
                fprintf(stderr, "Could not find debugfs\n");
                exit(-1);
        }

        marker = make_path("trace_marker");
        pipe = make_path("trace_pipe");

        markfd = open(marker, O_WRONLY);
        if (markfd < 0) {
                perror("marker");
                exit(-1);
        }
        trace_pipe_fd = open(pipe, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK);
        if (trace_pipe_fd < 0) {
                perror("trace_pipe");
                exit(-1);
        }

        efd = epoll_create(1);
        if (efd < 0) {
                perror("epoll_create");
                exit(-1);
        }

        mark_write("some data");
        ret = epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, trace_pipe_fd, &ee);
        if (ret < 0) {
                perror("epoll_ctl");
                exit(-1);
        }
        epoll_wait(efd, &ee, 1, -1);
        read_trace_pipe();
        dwrt_pid = fork();
        assert(dwrt_pid != -1);
        if (dwrt_pid == 0) {
                sleep(10);
                mark_write("more data");
                printf("%d: written more data\n", getpid());
        } else {
                printf("%d: waitting for more data......\n", getpid());
                epoll_wait(efd, &ee, 1, -1);
                printf("%d: got more data\n", getpid());
                read_trace_pipe();
        }
        return 0;
}

Reply via email to