Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I'd like to set up is the reverse. The same way the "wild" kernels > tend to layer on top of my standard kernel, I'd like to have a lower > level, the "anti-wild" kernel. Something that is comprised of patches > that _everybody_ can agree on, and that doesn't get anything else. AT ALL. > > And that means that such a kernel would not get all patches that you'd > want. That's fine.
Let's see if I understand your intent: this new tree would be a better base for things like -ac than the mainline Linus kernel. It would always be a single short branch off the latest mainline stable kernel. It would probably form a good base for vendor kernels and other stability-needed kernels, but by itself wouldn't necessarily be at that level of predictability. Does that accurately sum up what you're trying to get across? Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
