Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Gwe, 2005-03-04 at 11:28, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I think you're assuming that 2.6.x.y will have larger scope than is > > intended. > > The examples I gave for remap_vm_area and exec are both from real world > "gosh look I am root isn't that fun" type security holes. If that is > outside the scope of 2.6.x.y then you need to go back to the drawing > board.
Well *obviously* things like that are in scope. It's hardly likely that "maintainers will forget the backport" in that case, is it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
