3.2.60-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com>

commit 5a9a55bf9157d3490b0c8c4c81d4708602c26e07 upstream.

We need to use writel() instead of writel_relaxed() when starting
a channel, to ensure all the descriptors have been flushed before
the activation.

While at it, remove the unneeded read-modify-write and make the
code simpler.

Signed-off-by: Lior Amsalem <al...@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: it was using __raw_readl() and __raw_writel()
 which are just as wrong]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/dma/mv_xor.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/dma/mv_xor.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/mv_xor.c
@@ -218,12 +218,10 @@ static void mv_set_mode(struct mv_xor_ch
 
 static void mv_chan_activate(struct mv_xor_chan *chan)
 {
-       u32 activation;
-
        dev_dbg(chan->device->common.dev, " activate chan.\n");
-       activation = __raw_readl(XOR_ACTIVATION(chan));
-       activation |= 0x1;
-       __raw_writel(activation, XOR_ACTIVATION(chan));
+
+       /* writel ensures all descriptors are flushed before activation */
+       writel(BIT(0), XOR_ACTIVATION(chan));
 }
 
 static char mv_chan_is_busy(struct mv_xor_chan *chan)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to