3.2.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfie...@redhat.com>
commit 27b11428b7de097c42f205beabb1764f4365443b upstream.
The current code assumes a one-to-one lockowner<->lock stateid
correspondance.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -3820,6 +3820,10 @@ static bool same_lockowner_ino(struct nf
if (!same_owner_str(&lo->lo_owner, owner, clid))
return false;
+ if (list_empty(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids)) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return false;
+ }
lst = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
return lst->st_file->fi_inode == inode;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
