On 06/06/2014 02:13 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
>>
>> The only real downside to that would be the chance of bitrot if that
>> code isn't getting used on native builds.
>
> Sure. Does anybody really care?
>
> You could obviously just open-code the things, but the fact is,
> "le64toh()" isn't exactly a standard function anyway, so now that I
> see it needed I go "yeah, that's clearly completely unacceptable".
>
> I'd much rather say "screw cross-compiling" (because let's face it,
> nobody sane cross-compiles x86 on anything else) than say "screw old
> machines".
>
I'm thinking we should just carry the support functions with us, we
already have some of those in tools/include. Working on a patchset for
this.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
