On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:29:41AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 29/05/14 23:11, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > On Thu, 29 May 2014 12:08:32 +1000 > > Greg Ungerer <g...@uclinux.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Inside kernel/rcy/tree.c in __call_rcu() it does an alignment check on > >> the head pointer passed in. This trips on m68k systems, because they only > >> need alignment of 32bit quantities to 16bit boundaries. > > > > __alignof perhaps ? > > That might do. Change then becomes something like: > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > @@ -2467,7 +2467,7 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct > rcu_ > unsigned long flags; > struct rcu_data *rdp; > > - WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned long)head & 0x3); /* Misaligned rcu_head! */ > + WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned long)head & (__alignof__(head) - 1)); /* > Misaligned rcu_head! */
Hmmm... The purpose of the check is to reserve the low-order bits to allow RCU to classify callbacks as being time-critical or not. RCU can probably live with a single bit, but if there is some architecture out there that simply refuses to do alignment, I need to know about it. (See "git show 0bb7b59d6e2b8" for more info.) So how about this instead? - WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned long)head & 0x1); /* Misaligned rcu_head! */ (Trying to remember if I have seen Linux kernel code that uses both the lower bits...) Thanx, Paul > if (debug_rcu_head_queue(head)) { > /* Probable double call_rcu(), so leak the callback. */ > ACCESS_ONCE(head->func) = rcu_leak_callback; > > Thanks > Greg > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/