On 6/5/2014 9:42 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Greg KH (gre...@linuxfoundation.org): >> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:39:09PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 05, 2014 11:59:11 PM Jiri Kosina wrote: >>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> James has had to step back from doing kernel work for a few weeks, so >>>>> I've offered to step up and handle the security patches to get shuttled >>>>> to Linus for merging for a while. >>>> As exactly this (working with active contributors to help co-maintain the >>>> subsystem) has been brought at the ksummit maling list, I am just curious >>>> whether noone else actively working in that area was willing to step up? >>>> >>>> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --git -f security/ >>>> James Morris <james.l.mor...@oracle.com> (supporter:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM) >>>> ... >>>> >>>> If not, then I think this can be shown as a prime example why the problem >>>> of "non-substituability" of many maintainers is actually real. >>> Once several of us became aware that James was stepping away for a few >>> weeks >>> (I should mention this was not a planned absence and took most of us by >>> surprise) we had a brief discussion off-list and several of us did offer to >>> "step-up"; Serge had already created a repo and since he had pushed patches >>> while James was away in the past it seemed a reasonable approach this time >>> around. >> That's great, as the communication around this has not been very much >> (an non-existant on the subsystem mailing list) I was not aware of it. >> >> If Serge wants to do this, and as he has been the stand-in for James in >> the past, I have _no_ objection to this at all. >> >> Serge, feel free to resend your patches to Linus if he doesn't pick them >> up in a few days, with the information that you are doing this in >> James's absence for a while. > Will do (and wil cc: lsm). > >> So, that was easy, I don't have to do this at all, great. >> >> greg k-h
How can I verify that the pull James accepted from me is moving forward somehow? Or, if it isn't, where does it go now? On Thu, 15 May 2014, Casey Schaufler wrote: > The following changes since commit f64410ec665479d7b4b77b7519e814253ed0f686: > > selinux: correctly label /proc inodes in use before the policy is loaded > (2014-03-19 16:46:18 -0400) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.gitorious.org/smack-next/kernel.git smack-for-3.16 > > for you to fetch changes up to ec554fa75ec94dcf47e52db9551755679c10235b: Thanks, pulled. -- James Morris <jmor...@namei.org> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-security-module" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
