On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Anshuman Khandual
<khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 06/05/2014 08:51 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
>> Build throws following errors when CONFIG_SMP=n
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c: In function
>> ‘pnv_kexec_wait_secondaries_down’:
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/setup.c:179:4: error: implicit declaration of
>> function ‘get_hard_smp_processor_id’
>> rc = opal_query_cpu_status(get_hard_smp_processor_id(i),
>>
>> The usage of get_hard_smp_processor_id() needs the declaration from
>> <asm/smp.h>. The file setup.c includes <linux/sched.h>, which in-turn
>> includes <linux/smp.h>. However, <linux/smp.h> includes <asm/smp.h>
>> only on SMP configs and hence UP builds fail.
>>
>> Fix this by directly including <asm/smp.h> in setup.c unconditionally.
>
> Can you please clean up the description in the commit message ? and also
> the first line in the commit message should mention that the patch is
> trying to fix a UP specific build failure.
Both the one-line summary and the first line already mention "UP" or
"CONFIG_SMP=n".
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
