3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>

commit 7791c8423f1f7f4dad94e753bae67461d5b80be8 upstream.

Some EFI implementations return always a MaximumVariableSize of 0,
check against max_size only if it is non-zero.
My Intel DQ67SW desktop board has such an implementation.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Cc: Rui Xiang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -979,7 +979,12 @@ efi_status_t efi_query_variable_store(u3
        if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
                return status;
 
-       if (!storage_size || size > remaining_size || size > max_size ||
+       if (!max_size && remaining_size > size)
+               printk_once(KERN_ERR FW_BUG "Broken EFI implementation"
+                           " is returning MaxVariableSize=0\n");
+
+       if (!storage_size || size > remaining_size ||
+           (max_size && size > max_size) ||
            (remaining_size - size) < (storage_size / 2))
                return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to