On Mon, 28 April 2014 17:22:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:40:39 -0400 J__rn Engel <jo...@logfs.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 April 2014 15:40:24 -0400, J__rn Engel wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 April 2014 20:52:47 -0400, J__rn Engel wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I use the patch below for some time now.  While it doesn't avoid the
> > > > log pollution in the first place, it lessens the impact somewhat.
> > > 
> > > Added a config option and ported it to current -linus.  Andrew, would
> > > you take this patch?
> > 
> > Andrew?  Did you dislike this patch for some reason or just miss it in
> > the thread?
> 
> Neither ;) I try to respond in some way to all patches unless I think it's 
> clear
> to the originator why I took no action.  And I think I'm pretty good at
> not losing stuff.
> 
> otoh, it has only been four days, three of which I spent offline...

Ping.  It is closer to 40 days now.  Can I fault this patch back into
your memory?

Jörn

--
Good warriors cause others to come to them and do not go to others.
-- Sun Tzu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to