On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Would you be willing to carry this series? Andy Lutomirski appears > happy with it now. (Thanks again for all the feedback Andy!) If so, it > has a relatively small merge conflict with the bpf changes living in > net-next. Would you prefer I rebase against net-next, let sfr handle > it, get carried in net-next, or some other option?
Well, I'm still not entirely convinced that we want to have this much multiplexing in a prctl, and I'm still a bit unconvinced that the code wouldn't be better off it it were completely atomic in the sense that it would either work or fail without doing anything. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
