At Sun, 1 Jun 2014 16:02:51 +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > > There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized. > > This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called > cppcheck.
It won't happen in reality. And, initializing to some random values isn't always received good. You can use uninitialized_var() in such a case, too. Takashi > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <[email protected]> > --- > sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c b/sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c > index 21b373b..788a31c 100644 > --- a/sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c > +++ b/sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c > @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int snd_wm8766_ctl_get(struct snd_kcontrol > *kcontrol, > { > struct snd_wm8766 *wm = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); > int n = kcontrol->private_value; > - u16 val1, val2; > + u16 val1 = 0, val2 = 0; > > if (wm->ctl[n].get) > wm->ctl[n].get(wm, &val1, &val2); > -- > 1.7.10.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
