On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If we raise the stack size on x86_64 to 16k, what about i386? > Beside of the fact that most of you consider 32bits as dead and must die... ;)
x86-32 doesn't have nearly the same issue, since a large portion of stack content tends to be pointers and longs. So it's not like it uses half the stack, but a 32-bit environment does use a lot less stack than a 64-bit one. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/