On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:47:38AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> It may be worth at least pointing out that mce_severity looks at >> whether we faulted from kernel context. I missed that the first time >> around because mce_severity doesn't take a pt_regs pointer. > > Right, but next time we talk about a different aspect which isn't > commented on in the handler, we'd have to add to it again, until we've > rewritten the whole function in pseudo code. > > I think simply pointing to the function which decides the fate of the > machine based on the MCE severity is enough - people can then go and > stare at it, albeit with some struggle.
Fair enough. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. > -- -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
