On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 12:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 09:33 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Scott, > > > > On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 17:37 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S: > > > Assembler messages: > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:89: > > > Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:238: > > > Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:269: > > > Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:281: > > > Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:441: > > > Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:510: > > > Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:881: > > > Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > > > /home/scott/fsl/git/linux/upstream/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:918: > > > Error: unrecognized opcode: `tlb_miss_prolog_stats' > > > > Thanks for testing! > > > > That's a bit surprising. The patch is intended to be a non event. Ie, it > > only removes what the preprocessor would have removed anyway. Unless I > > botched it, of course. > > > > What exactly did you test there? > > For what it's worth: I can't reproduce this error with the cross > compiler now shipped with Fedora 20 (ie, powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) > 4.8.1 20130717 (Red Hat 4.8.1-5)). It shows a nice and clean > AS arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.o > > in the output. > > That's v3.15-rc6, with just this patch, and using a .config generated, > with "make oldconfig", from arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64e_defconfig.
Hmm, I tried applying again and it was fine. I guess I accidentally removed one line too many when resolving a conflict with b1576fec7f4dd4657694fefc97fda4cf28ec68e9 "powerpc: No need to use dot symbols when branching to a function" that's in Ben's -next tree. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
