On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 07:39:37PM +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote: > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are > modified > to use time_before() instead of plain, error-prone math.
Nit: commit messages are best wrapped around column 72.
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoell...@gmx.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
> index f30b842..b08db66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
> @@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ static void radeon_dynpm_idle_work_handler(struct
> work_struct *work)
> * to false since we want to wait for vbl to avoid flicker.
> */
> if (rdev->pm.dynpm_planned_action != DYNPM_ACTION_NONE &&
> - jiffies > rdev->pm.dynpm_action_timeout) {
> + time_before(rdev->pm.dynpm_action_timeout, jiffies)) {
> radeon_pm_get_dynpm_state(rdev);
> radeon_pm_set_clocks(rdev);
> }
I think time_after(jiffies, rdev->pm.dynpm_action_timeout) would be more
intuitive, but either way:
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
pgpdqGeEJpHVT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
