Hi
Ahh, yes. That's niecer..
I am sending a new patch. If it is as you intended, I do the same with
the l3ni1.c file.
Best regards
Rickard Strandqvist
2014-05-19 3:12 GMT+02:00 David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>:
> From: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
> Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 19:18:21 +0200
>
>> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
>>
>> Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
> ...
>
>> @@ -2208,8 +2208,12 @@ static int l3dss1_cmd_global(struct PStack *st,
>> isdn_ctrl *ic)
>> { free_invoke_id(st, id);
>> return (-2);
>> }
>> - pc->prot.dss1.ll_id = ic->parm.dss1_io.ll_id; /*
>> remember id */
>> - pc->prot.dss1.proc = ic->parm.dss1_io.proc; /* and
>> procedure */
>> +
>> + if (pc)
>> + {
>> + pc->prot.dss1.ll_id = ic->parm.dss1_io.ll_id;
>> /* remember id */
>> + pc->prot.dss1.proc = ic->parm.dss1_io.proc; /*
>> and procedure */
>> + }
>
> I think rather the intention was to put these pc-> assignments in the
> timeout > 0 code block.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
