Hello!
> I agree :) . But, if we look to the code, we can notice that there is actually
> no reason for npar to be unsigned. What do you think of this version?
What does it try to solve? Your version is in no way better than the previous
one.
The previous one was more readable and it's quite possible that both
will be compiled to the same sequence of instructions.
Also, as Arjan noted, if you want to improve the code, use memset.
Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
American patent law: two monkeys, fourteen days.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
