On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:27:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 27 of February 2005 18:50, Pavel Machek wrote: [snip] > > Ok, this one. > > > > I do not know what is going wrong. swsusp seems to work for > > people... or at least it works for me. Here's my .config, perhaps you > > have something unusual? > > > > I do have CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION="/dev/hda1", perhaps that's > > neccessary? > > I don't set CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION, but I pass the "resume" parameter > to the kernel and it works (no fuss, on x86-64 and i386).
I have the same setup as Rafael, on i386 boxes. swsusp was very messed-up for me in earlier 2.6.11-rc, but with -rc4 (or maybe it's one of the -bk snapshots between -rc4 and -rc5) it works for me again. Specifically, in the failing releases, swsusp would never succeed in suspending the machine. Since the problem is gone now, I think I have better uses for my time than figuring out when the problem started and when it was fixed, but I just wanted to mention that in fact there are problems in earlier 2.6.11-rc releases that seem to be fixed later on. -Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
